Essay on Faith in Fear and Trembling by Kierkegaard
2217 Words9 Pages
Kierkegaard believes that true faith can only be attained through a double movement of giving up rationality or logic, while at the same time believing one can understand logically. In “Fear and Trembling” Kierkegaard relates true faith to the Knight of infinite resignation and the Knight of faith; in this paper, I will examine this claim and show why Kierkegaard’s analogy is an excellent metaphor for the double movement which is required in one’s quest to attain faith and why.
Kierkegaard’s position on faith is represented with the Knight of infinite resignation and the Knight of faith. The Knight of faith is regarded as the one who believes in that which is absurd. For, he is the knight that is able to believe in the things that are…show more content…
So now, not only is Abraham faced with killing his own son, he is also supposed to still be considered in a religious context to be sacrificing his son. The Knight of infinite resignation sees this contradiction, this logical impossibility, and is aware of how this command defies rationality. This knight accepts that, in this life, his beloved son is going to die and that his hand will be the one to deliver this task. The main point Kierkegaard makes is when he goes on to say that to have faith, one must have experienced both of these stages. One must experience the stage of infinite resignation before being able to attain faith. “Infinite resignation is the last stage before faith, so that anyone who has not made this movement does not have faith” (Kierkegaard 75).
Kierkegaard goes even further on to explain why, “for only in infinite resignation does my eternal validity become transparent to me, and only then can there be talk of grasping existence on the strength of faith” (75). Kierkegaard’s position is made clear, only after one has had to make a decision from a place contradiction, can one truly have faith. Faith is not just blindly going along and believing against rationale just because that is what you have been raised or told to do. He addresses this by describing a young girl, “Thus that of a young girl in the face of all difficulties rests assure that her desire will be
Fear And Trembling Summary
SuperSummary, a modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, offers high-quality study guides that feature detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, quotes, and essay topics. This one-page guide includes a plot summary and brief analysis of Fear And Trembling by Søren Kierkegaard.
Fear and Trembling is a philosophical tract by Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, first published in 1843 under the pseudonym Johannes de Silento (John of the Silence). The title is taken from a line from Philippians 2:12. A work of Christian philosophy, Fear and Trembling focuses on the incident in the Bible where Abraham was ordered to sacrifice his son Isaac, and examines Abraham’s anxiety, fear, and philosophical crisis when he had to decide whether to take up the knife and fulfill God’s orders, or ignore them and prioritize his relationship with his family. The tract is seen as partly autobiographical, in that it reflects Kierkegaard’s relationship with Regine Olsen, his lover, whom he left to commit himself to his study of God. Considered one of the major works of existentialism, Fear and Trembling explores themes including the nature of faith, the love of man versus the love of God, and the fear that accompanies belief in God. Divided into three parts, Fear and Trembling was praised for its in-depth look at the theological underpinnings of Christianity, and for its humanization of the story of Abraham and Isaac. It is still studied widely by theologians today.
Fear and Trembling begins with a preface and an Exordium that introduces the reader to the story of Abraham and Isaac. This is followed by a Eulogy, where Kierkegaard explores how Abraham became the father of faith, despite being a humble man who didn’t expect to become anything great. It looks at what was within Abraham’s character that allowed him to be used by God for greatness, and says that his willingness to struggle with God was what made him stand out. This leads into the three Problemata, or problems, that Kierkegaard explores, looking at how a man willing to sacrifice his own son can be revered as the father of faith. The first problem is the question, is there a teleological suspension of the ethical? Kierkegaard asks what is the ethical, exactly, and cites the work of Georg Hegel, which states that it is the right of the subjective will that it should regard as good what it recognizes as authoritative. Abraham was in the difficult situation of having to choose between the ethical requirements of his surroundings and what he regarded as his absolute duty to God. Kierkegaard disagrees with Hegel’s assessment, believing that Abraham’s absolute duty to God overrode his personal beliefs in right and wrong and what was assumed as such in the world at large.
In the second problem, Kierkegaard explores the concept of absolute duty to God, and contrasts his beliefs with that of Hegel and Descartes. He states that the act of resignation does not require faith, because what one gets from it is their eternal consciousness. He describes the process of surrendering to God as a purely philosophical movement that takes great discipline and that he struggles to make when it is demanded of him. He describes the process as starving himself into submission until he fully embraces God’s will and his eternal consciousness becomes one with his love for God. That, he says, is the highest state of being. The paradox, he states, is that while the act of resignation doesn’t require faith, to develop one’s eternal consciousness beyond the most basic level does. As Kierkegaard believes that resignation to God’s will is the highest form of being, he makes the case that Abraham was right to follow his absolute duty to God above all else. He believes that all Christianity is rooted in paradox, and one must either accept it fully or reject it fully as a result.
The final problem Kierkegaard explores is that of Abraham’s decision to conceal his plans to sacrifice Isaac from his wife Sarah, his trusted servant Eliezer, and of course from his son Isaac himself. Kierkegaard states that Abraham was engaged in a process known as reflective grief, where he experienced not only grief over the upcoming loss of his son but also the complex joy of gaining his new association with an unknown power. This lends itself to quiet, inward reflection. Kierkegaard states that the task that God appointed Abraham was so horrific that no one who did not have his unique connection to God could possibly understand why he was about to do it. Thus, he became a knight of faith through his willingness to heed God’s words and sacrifice his son, but there was no way to explain it to anyone else. Abraham was suffering, but Kierkegaard argues he was actually acting nobly by bearing that burden alone. As is well known, though, that sacrifice – Abraham bearing his burden alone in the name of his faith – was the sacrifice God truly wanted, and Isaac was ultimately spared.
Søren Aabye Kierkegaard was a Danish philosopher, theologian, poet, social critic, and religious scholar considered by many to be the father of existentialist philosophy. Known for his use of metaphor, irony, and parables, he wrote in-depth works on organized religion, Christian philosophy, and ethics. He is also considered to be one of the fathers of modern psychology. He wrote many of his early works under pseudonyms, which allowed him to express opinions from different perspectives and engage with his alter egos in complex dialogue. He is best known for his Upbuilding Discourses series, of which Fear and Trembling is a part, and which focuses heavily on the questions surrounding man’s relationship to God. Widely influential on both 19th century and modern-day philosophy, he remains widely read. A statue of him today stands in front of the Royal Library in Copenhagen, Denmark.